Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 789
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $20,210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeremy R Forbes | De Smet, SD 57231 | $76,266 |
62 | Lynn Hesby | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $75,559 |
63 | Ridgeview Limited Liability Company | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $74,718 |
64 | Daniel Leroy Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $74,442 |
65 | Norman Madison | Carthage, SD 57323 | $74,414 |
66 | Roger A Haufschild | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $74,261 |
67 | Douglas Vincent Kazmerzak | Erwin, SD 57233 | $74,231 |
68 | Steven J Duffy | Oldham, SD 57051 | $73,827 |
69 | Royce Dale Rolsma | Hetland, SD 57212 | $73,542 |
70 | Bryan Jensen | Badger, SD 57214 | $73,016 |
71 | Raymond Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $72,621 |
72 | Ryan Dean Olson | Erwin, SD 57233 | $71,640 |
73 | Keith Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $71,469 |
74 | Timothy James Stewart | Arlington, SD 57212 | $70,060 |
75 | Gary Osvog | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $69,629 |
76 | Gullickson Cattle Company Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $69,613 |
77 | Sandy Leo Schultz | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $69,423 |
78 | Roger G Lee | De Smet, SD 57231 | $67,489 |
79 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $66,556 |
80 | Roger Lee Walls | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $65,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”