Total Disaster Programs in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,283
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $47,986,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kyle Gross | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,547,001 |
2 | Rick Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,095,137 |
3 | Alan Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,013,070 |
4 | Vicky Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $944,384 |
5 | John Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $940,294 |
6 | Kathy Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $789,640 |
7 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $776,377 |
8 | H T Albrecht & Sons Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $571,795 |
9 | Peckenpaugh Ranch Inc | Carthage, SD 57323 | $463,904 |
10 | Frank E Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $433,526 |
11 | E Weerts Inc | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $420,041 |
12 | Loryn Gehm | De Smet, SD 57231 | $413,100 |
13 | Gregory Scott Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $400,076 |
14 | Bradley John Albrecht | Arlington, SD 57212 | $386,605 |
15 | Jeffrey Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $384,341 |
16 | Jon Charles Albrecht | Howard, SD 57349 | $373,662 |
17 | Collins Hutterian Brethren Inc | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $369,333 |
18 | Page Brothers | De Smet, SD 57231 | $347,956 |
19 | Catherine A Murphy | Arlington, SD 57212 | $334,454 |
20 | Chad Alan Murphy | Arlington, SD 57212 | $328,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>