Production Flexibility Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,130
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $23,616,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Loryn Gehm | De Smet, SD 57231 | $137,591 |
22 | Hi Spirit Ranch Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $132,918 |
23 | Jon Charles Albrecht | Howard, SD 57349 | $130,997 |
24 | Edward Frank Wilkinson | Erwin, SD 57233 | $130,523 |
25 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $127,813 |
26 | Plainview Farm | Oldham, SD 57051 | $127,366 |
27 | Kopman Brothers | Bryant, SD 57221 | $126,822 |
28 | H T Albrecht & Sons Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $124,804 |
29 | Warren Arthur Casper | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $124,463 |
30 | Jerome Joe Gruenhagen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $122,973 |
31 | Jacobsen Farms Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $120,996 |
32 | Richard Rolsma | Hetland, SD 57212 | $118,214 |
33 | Pleasant Hill Farm | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $118,106 |
34 | Blaine Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $117,462 |
35 | Rusche Bros | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $117,001 |
36 | Lynn D Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $115,975 |
37 | Vicky Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $114,431 |
38 | Peckenpaugh Ranch Inc | Carthage, SD 57323 | $113,319 |
39 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $112,882 |
40 | Sandy Leo Schultz | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $112,845 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”