Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 118
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $162,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jensen Double J Farms | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $2,093 |
22 | Debra D Coughlin | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,998 |
23 | James P Coughlin | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,998 |
24 | Wertz Family Limited Partnership | Huron, SD 57350 | $1,853 |
25 | Robert Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $1,824 |
26 | Ridgeview Limited Liability Company | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $1,792 |
27 | Catherine Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,717 |
28 | Jon Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,717 |
29 | Gregory Dale Josephsen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $1,709 |
30 | Bryson Ensz | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $1,597 |
31 | Jeffrey Madison | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,281 |
32 | Steven Palmlund | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,083 |
33 | Neil L Palmlund | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,083 |
34 | Norman Ernest Koehlmoos | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,052 |
35 | James H Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,047 |
36 | Paige Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,006 |
37 | Brooke Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,006 |
38 | Brady Larsen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $861 |
39 | Tyler Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $854 |
40 | Jeffrey Eschenbaum | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $795 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”