Farm Subsidy information
Lincoln County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 586
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $17,416,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth Leroy Kuehl | Canton, SD 57013 | $23,679 |
42 | Mark A Bovill | Alcester, SD 57001 | $23,633 |
43 | Ok Corral Inc | Lennox, SD 57039 | $23,196 |
44 | Kirk S Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $22,977 |
45 | Rjs Properties LLC | Worthing, SD 57077 | $22,790 |
46 | , | $22,681 | |
47 | Matthew Douglas Adams | Beresford, SD 57004 | $21,629 |
48 | Gordon Wayne Sweeter | Lennox, SD 57039 | $21,613 |
49 | Timothy Andrew Andersen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $21,525 |
50 | S & M Farms Inc | Canton, SD 57013 | $21,256 |
51 | Terry R Cowan | Surprise, AZ 85387 | $21,236 |
52 | Matthew Robert Loewe | Lennox, SD 57039 | $21,151 |
53 | , | $21,127 | |
54 | Harold Allen Fluit | Fairview, SD 57027 | $20,247 |
55 | Erik Scott | Canton, SD 57013 | $19,926 |
56 | Brian Abbas | Worthing, SD 57077 | $19,681 |
57 | John William Anderson Jr | Hudson, SD 57034 | $19,307 |
58 | Lester David Schmid | Beresford, SD 57004 | $19,056 |
59 | William R Murray Credit Trust | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $18,539 |
60 | Mark Kendall Kuehl | Canton, SD 57013 | $18,529 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”