Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 165
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $737,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John Brent Van De Stroet | Fairview, SD 57027 | $1,244 |
122 | Mace Van De Stroet | Inwood, IA 51240 | $1,213 |
123 | Darrin E Van De Stroet | Inwood, IA 51240 | $1,208 |
124 | Casey Wright | Centerville, SD 57014 | $1,180 |
125 | Roger Stevens | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,145 |
126 | Randy Smit | Lennox, SD 57039 | $1,129 |
127 | Micheal Joe Zeilstra | Fairview, SD 57027 | $1,120 |
128 | Paul D Harms | Tea, SD 57064 | $1,116 |
129 | James Duane Koopsma | Fairview, SD 57027 | $1,085 |
130 | Barbara Carruthers | Baltic, SD 57003 | $1,084 |
131 | Raymond Duane Hazel | Hudson, SD 57034 | $1,075 |
132 | Mark Allen Hazel | Hudson, SD 57034 | $1,075 |
133 | Craig Robert Winquist | Canton, SD 57013 | $1,052 |
134 | Glenn D Harms | Chancellor, SD 57015 | $1,030 |
135 | Anna M Aasheim Rev Living Trust | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,007 |
136 | Roger Dean Kock | Chancellor, SD 57015 | $995 |
137 | Keith L Bossman | Lennox, SD 57039 | $986 |
138 | Ryan James Dieters | Larchwood, IA 51241 | $937 |
139 | Kyle N Grace | Hartford, SD 57033 | $917 |
140 | Bastian Dale Lems | Inwood, IA 51240 | $800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”