Farm Subsidy information
Lincoln County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 899
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $19,228,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enger Farms | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $605,698 |
| 2 | Dakota Plains Dairy LLC | Grand Rapids, MI 49544 | $340,028 |
| 3 | Sherwood James Beek | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $177,842 |
| 4 | Van Den Top Farms LLC | Canton, SD 57013 | $114,570 |
| 5 | Michael Gregory Slack | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $107,083 |
| 6 | Larry W Poppens | Lennox, SD 57039 | $101,604 |
| 7 | Michael Eugene Poppens | Tea, SD 57064 | $97,743 |
| 8 | Jason Francis Johnke | Centerville, SD 57014 | $95,987 |
| 9 | Bradley Scott Smidt | Lennox, SD 57039 | $89,154 |
| 10 | Tim K Larson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $87,002 |
| 11 | Andrew James Ruyter | Fairview, SD 57027 | $78,902 |
| 12 | Haverhals Feed Lot Inc | Hudson, SD 57034 | $74,529 |
| 13 | Chris Carlson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $70,701 |
| 14 | Leonard F Block Jr | Canton, SD 57013 | $69,261 |
| 15 | Clifford John Sorum | Canton, SD 57013 | $64,965 |
| 16 | Jeffrey Keith Sorum | Hudson, SD 57034 | $64,965 |
| 17 | Todd Koedam | Canton, SD 57013 | $64,449 |
| 18 | Nothdurft Farms LLC | Beresford, SD 57004 | $63,216 |
| 19 | Jerome Van De Stroet | Inwood, IA 51240 | $61,202 |
| 20 | Matthew Robert Loewe | Lennox, SD 57039 | $60,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf