Direct Payment Program in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,631
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $44,013,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Thompson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $241,135 |
22 | Louis Vander Laan Jr | Beresford, SD 57004 | $230,148 |
23 | Zweifel Brothers Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $229,576 |
24 | Bill Crevier And Jerry Crevier Pt | Chancellor, SD 57015 | $222,389 |
25 | Ronald William Albers | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $206,492 |
26 | Dennis Michael Albers | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $204,889 |
27 | Robert Alan Evanson | Hudson, SD 57034 | $203,221 |
28 | Darla Mae Enger | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $199,661 |
29 | Bradley Scott Smidt | Lennox, SD 57039 | $199,287 |
30 | Jason Derek Van Den Top | Canton, SD 57013 | $196,298 |
31 | Daryl Akland | Beresford, SD 57004 | $195,487 |
32 | Michael Gene Knutson | Canton, SD 57013 | $195,475 |
33 | Loren Eugene Knutson | Canton, SD 57013 | $195,375 |
34 | Dale Alan Geiken | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $194,760 |
35 | Rodney Renback | Lennox, SD 57039 | $189,685 |
36 | Pbp Farms | Hurley, SD 57036 | $189,123 |
37 | Kirk David Rikansrud | Canton, SD 57013 | $185,166 |
38 | Norman Arne Rasmussen | Hudson, SD 57034 | $183,960 |
39 | Duane A Johnson | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $181,907 |
40 | Tim Alan De Lay | Hudson, SD 57034 | $178,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”