Market Loss Assistance Program in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,604
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $13,738,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Eugene Sproul | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $61,060 |
22 | Ronald William Albers | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $59,809 |
23 | Louis Vander Laan Jr | Beresford, SD 57004 | $57,179 |
24 | Dale Gaylon Johnson | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $56,649 |
25 | Roger Reiners | Canton, SD 57013 | $56,124 |
26 | Gregory Lee Slack | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $53,938 |
27 | Gerrit Jr Van Den Top | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $52,762 |
28 | Darrell L Timmerman | Tea, SD 57064 | $52,218 |
29 | Norman Arne Rasmussen | Hudson, SD 57034 | $51,977 |
30 | Dennis Michael Albers | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $51,668 |
31 | Cedar Lawn Farm | Worthing, SD 57077 | $50,430 |
32 | Larson Brothers Dairy Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $49,835 |
33 | Mark Donald Javers | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $48,891 |
34 | Steve Douglas Homandberg | Hudson, SD 57034 | $48,864 |
35 | Darrel Lance Sogn | Hudson, SD 57034 | $47,863 |
36 | Roetzel Feedlot Inc | Arnolds Park, IA 51331 | $47,746 |
37 | Atkins Family Farms Inc | Tea, SD 57064 | $47,340 |
38 | S A C Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $47,208 |
39 | Arlan Dale Kooima | Canton, SD 57013 | $46,868 |
40 | Kirk David Rikansrud | Canton, SD 57013 | $45,654 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”