Conservation Reserve Program in Lyman County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,117
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lyman County, South Dakota totaled $95,990,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lower Brule Sioux Tribe | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $4,803,568 |
2 | Sd Building Authority | Sioux Falls, SD 57117 | $2,334,958 |
3 | Le Roy Krier | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $1,099,513 |
4 | Urban Grain & Cattle Co | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $1,013,777 |
5 | Clifford D Halverson | Kennebec, SD 57544 | $970,113 |
6 | Lower Brule Wildlife Dept | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $947,389 |
7 | Robert Krier | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $938,847 |
8 | Russell Dean Hoelscher | Pierre, SD 57501 | $867,688 |
9 | Dennis Gerard | Kennebec, SD 57544 | $866,695 |
10 | Pat Halverson | Kennebec, SD 57544 | $861,351 |
11 | Deremo Inc | Sioux Falls, SD 57109 | $858,604 |
12 | Jolene K Mc Manigal | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $845,273 |
13 | Edward Jessop | Presho, SD 57568 | $834,183 |
14 | Richard Smith | Vivian, SD 57576 | $828,077 |
15 | Le Roy Authier | Vivian, SD 57576 | $824,127 |
16 | P Craig Reuman | Presho, SD 57568 | $792,719 |
17 | Ehlers Farms Inc | Presho, SD 57568 | $783,616 |
18 | Owen Garnos | Presho, SD 57568 | $740,252 |
19 | Pheasants Heritage Preservation Llp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $732,237 |
20 | Quinten Garnos | Presho, SD 57568 | $685,786 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>