Conservation Reserve Program in McCook County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 344
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in McCook County, South Dakota totaled $2,533,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steve Gessner | Salem, SD 57058 | $26,220 |
22 | Daniel D Rabenhorst | Salem, SD 57058 | $26,107 |
23 | Michael Roche | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $26,048 |
24 | Frances J Streff Irr Trust | Salem, SD 57058 | $25,037 |
25 | Jeanette Hofer Trust | Bridgewater, SD 57319 | $24,031 |
26 | Huls Family Inc | Chadron, NE 69337 | $24,030 |
27 | Jeffrey Tuschen | Deadwood, SD 57732 | $23,297 |
28 | Todd Waldera | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $22,158 |
29 | Richard Eimers | Madison, SD 57042 | $22,068 |
30 | David S Mendel Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $21,891 |
31 | Soo Dell Farms LLC | Spencer, SD 57374 | $20,990 |
32 | , | $20,953 | |
33 | Maureen Francis Feterl | Salem, SD 57058 | $20,911 |
34 | Bryant Hofer | Salem, SD 57058 | $20,156 |
35 | Melton Family Irrevocable Trust | Rockville, MD 20850 | $19,250 |
36 | Steve Mccormick | Canistota, SD 57012 | $19,243 |
37 | Wayne R Tuschen | Madison, SD 57042 | $18,350 |
38 | Eagle Valley Properties LLC | Montrose, SD 57048 | $18,016 |
39 | James E Merkwan | Spencer, SD 57374 | $18,014 |
40 | Tuschens M & W Inc | Salem, SD 57058 | $17,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”