Total Conservation Programs in McCook County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 323
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in McCook County, South Dakota totaled $2,328,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Eichacker Family Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $9,550 |
82 | Oxarart Family Trust | Palm Desert, CA 92260 | $9,234 |
83 | , | $8,797 | |
84 | John Ruden | Spencer, SD 57374 | $8,777 |
85 | Mark Steven Jerman | Canistota, SD 57012 | $8,582 |
86 | Golden View Hutterian Brethren Inc | Salem, SD 57058 | $8,570 |
87 | Kevin George Weber | Montrose, SD 57048 | $8,569 |
88 | Alma Wollman Revocable Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $8,547 |
89 | Jerry R Hetland | Montrose, SD 57048 | $8,295 |
90 | Martin Kappenman | Saint Paul, MN 55116 | $8,232 |
91 | Josh Blindert | Salem, SD 57058 | $7,968 |
92 | Joan Elliott | Aurora, CO 80010 | $7,757 |
93 | Cynthia Greenburg | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $7,708 |
94 | Iron Post LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $7,663 |
95 | Lowell Herlyn | Marion, SD 57043 | $7,580 |
96 | Wendell Weeldreyer | Marion, SD 57043 | $7,575 |
97 | Patrick Lee Scheier | Salem, SD 57058 | $7,165 |
98 | Barney Joseph Roling | Salem, SD 57058 | $7,146 |
99 | James Edd Mcgregor | Salem, SD 57058 | $7,053 |
100 | Rotert Farms Limited Partnership | Salem, SD 57058 | $6,939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”