Total Conservation Programs in McPherson County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 156
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in McPherson County, South Dakota totaled $1,055,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Creighton W Miller | Pierre, SD 57501 | $2,025 |
102 | Sandra L Crawford | Laramie, WY 82072 | $2,021 |
103 | Charles A Haerter Administrative Tr | Scottsdale, AZ 85254 | $1,990 |
104 | Gerald Stroh | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $1,986 |
105 | Michael C Neuharth | Eureka, SD 57437 | $1,941 |
106 | Keith R Stugelmayer | Long Lake, SD 57457 | $1,930 |
107 | Spittler Revocable Trust | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $1,754 |
108 | Christine H Corell | Lodi, CA 95240 | $1,753 |
109 | Gary E Krein | Eureka, SD 57437 | $1,748 |
110 | Wilbert Morlock | Watertown, SD 57201 | $1,705 |
111 | Spring Creek Hutterian Brethren Inc | Forbes, ND 58439 | $1,675 |
112 | Eva M Schmidt Living Trust | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $1,648 |
113 | Kevin - Kevin R Shipley Rev Living Trust R Shipley | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,523 |
114 | Wayne D Shipley | Fargo, ND 58102 | $1,522 |
115 | Beth A Shipley | Fargo, ND 58104 | $1,522 |
116 | Barry Lapp | Eureka, SD 57437 | $1,213 |
117 | Dennis Q Wolff | Long Lake, SD 57457 | $1,209 |
118 | Wade L Weiszhaar | Leola, SD 57456 | $1,195 |
119 | Aman Brothers | Hosmer, SD 57448 | $1,176 |
120 | Zoa Libis | Springfield, SD 57062 | $1,159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”