Total Disaster Programs in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,106
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $50,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kim Delvin Stiegelmeier | Britton, SD 57430 | $277,868 |
42 | Ryan Charles Patterson | Britton, SD 57430 | $275,533 |
43 | Neil Foote | Langford, SD 57454 | $266,629 |
44 | Bien Farms Gp | Lake City, SD 57247 | $265,024 |
45 | Sjovall Feedyard Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $259,136 |
46 | David Lynn Docter | Lake City, SD 57247 | $257,156 |
47 | Triple J Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $252,290 |
48 | Roger Allen Mclaen | Forman, ND 58032 | $240,123 |
49 | Tigh G Fliehs | Claremont, SD 57432 | $233,894 |
50 | James Edward Peters | Britton, SD 57430 | $233,696 |
51 | Cory Dee Cole | Langford, SD 57454 | $232,357 |
52 | Ricki Allen Hoistad | Forman, ND 58032 | $231,996 |
53 | Loren Cutler | Veblen, SD 57270 | $229,040 |
54 | Hastings C Bar J Ranch Llp | Britton, SD 57430 | $226,182 |
55 | Leslie Wayne Erickson | Langford, SD 57454 | $225,315 |
56 | R & A Tank Gp | Britton, SD 57430 | $221,047 |
57 | Herbert A Jensen | Langford, SD 57454 | $215,596 |
58 | Keith Jensen | Langford, SD 57454 | $214,631 |
59 | Douglas John Henley | Britton, SD 57430 | $213,661 |
60 | D & M Partnership | Amherst, SD 57421 | $213,554 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”