Total Emergency Relief Program in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 300
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $13,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sean P Parrow | Britton, SD 57430 | $109,658 |
42 | Dalton Docter Feedlot Inc | Amherst, SD 57421 | $106,267 |
43 | Dylan Lyle Anderson | Cayuga, ND 58013 | $103,619 |
44 | Westwood Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $102,792 |
45 | Lillian Anderson | Langford, SD 57454 | $101,063 |
46 | Ryan Charles Patterson | Britton, SD 57430 | $100,082 |
47 | Djs Farms Partnership | Langford, SD 57454 | $99,359 |
48 | James Edward Peters | Britton, SD 57430 | $99,216 |
49 | Jodi A Anderson LLC | Langford, SD 57454 | $94,954 |
50 | Grupe Farms LLC | Britton, SD 57430 | $93,577 |
51 | Jordan S Deutsch | Langford, SD 57454 | $93,296 |
52 | , | $93,296 | |
53 | Ross G Vig | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $92,569 |
54 | D & J Vig Family Farm Inc | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $89,327 |
55 | Malm & Cole Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $86,296 |
56 | Lansing Hutterian Brethren Inc | Claremont, SD 57432 | $85,447 |
57 | Tyler Ross Stiegelmeier | Britton, SD 57430 | $81,374 |
58 | Charles Kevin Carson | Langford, SD 57454 | $80,096 |
59 | Robert J Ellingson | Britton, SD 57430 | $76,390 |
60 | Deutsch Angus Inc | Eden, SD 57232 | $75,020 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”