Conservation Reserve Program in Marshall County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 436
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $6,183,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stp Acres Inc | Eden, SD 57232 | $30,628 |
62 | Chris Schlagel | Britton, SD 57430 | $30,414 |
63 | Hicks Family Trust | Port Orchard, WA 98367 | $30,260 |
64 | Wallace Farms | Elizabeth, AR 72531 | $29,976 |
65 | Robert O Williams Family Trust | Langford, SD 57454 | $29,875 |
66 | George J Pitzl | Lake City, SD 57247 | $29,828 |
67 | David F Reisenweber | Duluth, MN 55812 | $29,739 |
68 | Triple J Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $29,433 |
69 | Ksp Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $29,400 |
70 | Connie Cutler | Veblen, SD 57270 | $28,994 |
71 | Loren Cutler | Veblen, SD 57270 | $28,994 |
72 | Bill Tisher Family Trust | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $28,790 |
73 | Lj Steiner Farms LLC | Omaha, NE 68114 | $28,204 |
74 | La Mirada Limited Partnership | Lake City, SD 57247 | $28,146 |
75 | La Mirada Limited Partnership II | Lake City, SD 57247 | $28,146 |
76 | Dennis Eugene Fagerland | Langford, SD 57454 | $28,112 |
77 | Jean Phillips | Lake City, SD 57247 | $27,495 |
78 | Brenda K Andrews | Britton, SD 57430 | $27,391 |
79 | , | $27,391 | |
80 | First National Bank ** | Sioux Falls, SD 57117 | $27,194 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”