Counter Cyclical Program in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 485
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $5,591,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger Hill Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $20,384 |
82 | Cory Dee Cole | Langford, SD 57454 | $20,350 |
83 | Cag Farms Llp | Britton, SD 57430 | $20,217 |
84 | Waletich Farms | Langford, SD 57454 | $20,111 |
85 | Lien Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $20,034 |
86 | Alan Adolph Grupe | Britton, SD 57430 | $19,464 |
87 | Lee R Schneider | Britton, SD 57430 | $19,431 |
88 | Daniel W Olson | Houghton, SD 57449 | $19,191 |
89 | Roger Anthony Williams | Langford, SD 57454 | $19,085 |
90 | Keith William Ogren | Langford, SD 57454 | $18,574 |
91 | Harlan Bistodeau | Claremont, SD 57432 | $18,571 |
92 | Robert Carlson | Britton, SD 57430 | $18,463 |
93 | Frederick Keith Bessler | Veblen, SD 57270 | $18,403 |
94 | Clayton John Halverson | Lake City, SD 57247 | $18,402 |
95 | Bender Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $18,354 |
96 | Ricky Duane Vander Vorst | Claremont, SD 57432 | $18,037 |
97 | Double C Ranch Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $18,000 |
98 | Allan D Seibel | Britton, SD 57430 | $17,435 |
99 | Tami Atkinson | Britton, SD 57430 | $16,888 |
100 | Schultz Cattle Company LLC | Lake City, SD 57247 | $16,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”