Total Conservation Programs in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,215
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $103,128,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Colby K Olson | Amherst, SD 57421 | $226,760 |
142 | Sandra Jean Peters | Britton, SD 57430 | $226,001 |
143 | Robert Schuster | Eden, SD 57232 | $224,099 |
144 | Myron Steiner | Eden, SD 57232 | $222,132 |
145 | Gordon T Smith | Britton, SD 57430 | $221,822 |
146 | Brian J Nelson | Spicer, MN 56288 | $220,089 |
147 | Royce L Grimsrud | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $216,698 |
148 | Roger Anthony Williams | Langford, SD 57454 | $215,738 |
149 | Elmer Steiner | Eden, SD 57232 | $214,266 |
150 | Mark Luitjens | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $213,327 |
151 | Cory Cole Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $212,905 |
152 | James Luitjens | Claremont, SD 57432 | $212,797 |
153 | Greg Hanson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $211,822 |
154 | Dr L M Krista | Auburn, AL 36830 | $208,605 |
155 | Charles Guy | Veblen, SD 57270 | $206,600 |
156 | John Charles Eye | Britton, SD 57430 | $204,426 |
157 | Terrance Nordquist | Lake City, SD 57247 | $204,345 |
158 | Laverne J Steiner Revocable Trust | Omaha, NE 68144 | $203,083 |
159 | Ronald Jaspers | Eden, SD 57232 | $201,660 |
160 | Gary Stromseth | Eden, SD 57232 | $201,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”