Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 711
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $36,850,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | D & J Vig Family Farm Inc | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $185,064 |
22 | Nickeson Harvesting LLC | Veblen, SD 57270 | $184,299 |
23 | Charles K Rabenberg & Son Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $182,865 |
24 | Herbert A Jensen | Langford, SD 57454 | $175,902 |
25 | Hillcrest Farms Llp | Britton, SD 57430 | $175,668 |
26 | Bien Farms Gp | Lake City, SD 57247 | $173,887 |
27 | Schultz Cattle Company LLC | Lake City, SD 57247 | $173,075 |
28 | Scott R Anderson | Langford, SD 57454 | $157,787 |
29 | Miller Livestock Inc | Claremont, SD 57432 | $157,237 |
30 | Deutsch Angus Inc | Eden, SD 57232 | $156,307 |
31 | Hill Grain Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $154,447 |
32 | John Clark Fisher | Britton, SD 57430 | $151,048 |
33 | Michael Buisker | Britton, SD 57430 | $149,440 |
34 | Triple J Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $147,766 |
35 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $141,684 |
36 | Kervin Harold Olson | Amherst, SD 57421 | $139,139 |
37 | Renald Tank Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $138,288 |
38 | Mark Arnold Beck | Britton, SD 57430 | $134,701 |
39 | Bender Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $133,611 |
40 | Peter Rabenberg | Britton, SD 57430 | $128,112 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”