Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 663
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $25,734,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kervin Harold Olson | Amherst, SD 57421 | $223,570 |
2 | Jason Dean Bender | Britton, SD 57430 | $150,078 |
3 | Karen J Medhaug | Veblen, SD 57270 | $147,172 |
4 | Aaron Donald Beaner | Britton, SD 57430 | $146,500 |
5 | Adam Suther | Langford, SD 57454 | $140,089 |
6 | , | $139,289 | |
7 | Herbert A Jensen | Langford, SD 57454 | $136,875 |
8 | Troy Allen Person | Britton, SD 57430 | $136,875 |
9 | Medhaug Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $134,875 |
10 | Sunset Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $123,779 |
11 | James Edward Peters | Britton, SD 57430 | $111,845 |
12 | John Clark Fisher | Britton, SD 57430 | $110,071 |
13 | Black Bear Mountain Honey LLC | Sandy, OR 97055 | $102,544 |
14 | Lillian Anderson | Langford, SD 57454 | $101,063 |
15 | R & A Tank Gp | Britton, SD 57430 | $91,793 |
16 | Sjovall Feedyard Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $82,197 |
17 | Sandy Lane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $78,740 |
18 | D & J Vig Family Farm Inc | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $78,654 |
19 | Emit Payne Valnes | Eden, SD 57232 | $75,578 |
20 | Ricki Allen Hoistad | Forman, ND 58032 | $72,239 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>