Production Flexibility Program in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 723
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $18,169,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark Phillip Zastrow | Hecla, SD 57446 | $131,787 |
22 | D & R Ogren | Langford, SD 57454 | $131,608 |
23 | Symens Brothers | Amherst, SD 57421 | $131,188 |
24 | Roger Allen Mclaen | Forman, ND 58032 | $129,578 |
25 | Kervin Harold Olson | Amherst, SD 57421 | $128,365 |
26 | Robert C Erickson | Pierpont, SD 57468 | $125,565 |
27 | Charles Kevin Carson | Langford, SD 57454 | $123,397 |
28 | Gordon Bosse & Sons Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $123,171 |
29 | Hill Grain Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $116,954 |
30 | Paul Williams & Son Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $115,216 |
31 | D & J Vig Family Farm Inc | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $110,714 |
32 | Bill Tisher Farms Inc | Amherst, SD 57421 | $108,657 |
33 | Richard Gale Kristofferson | Britton, SD 57430 | $106,859 |
34 | Alan Adolph Grupe | Britton, SD 57430 | $106,435 |
35 | Medhaug Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $106,002 |
36 | Patterson Farm Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $105,286 |
37 | Renald Reese Tank | Britton, SD 57430 | $104,349 |
38 | Larry Lee Patterson Dec | Amherst, SD 57421 | $103,452 |
39 | T & D Farms | Britton, SD 57430 | $100,879 |
40 | Vietor Bros LLC | Amherst, SD 57421 | $98,654 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”