Total Conservation Programs in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,215
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $103,128,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kervin Harold Olson | Amherst, SD 57421 | $1,001,415 |
2 | Allen Anderson | Langford, SD 57454 | $993,011 |
3 | Sherman Vold | Britton, SD 57430 | $912,308 |
4 | Randall Beck | Hecla, SD 57446 | $897,073 |
5 | John Sherburn | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $871,611 |
6 | Malm & Cole Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $817,452 |
7 | Sunset Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $765,183 |
8 | Neal Hornseth | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $753,606 |
9 | Elaine M O'brien | Havana, ND 58043 | $750,693 |
10 | Newport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Claremont, SD 57432 | $719,667 |
11 | Rw Farms Inc | Ajo, AZ 85321 | $706,690 |
12 | Robert John Henley | Britton, SD 57430 | $685,144 |
13 | Raymond Janisch | Lake City, SD 57247 | $677,769 |
14 | Dennis Eugene Fagerland | Langford, SD 57454 | $677,419 |
15 | Sandy Lane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $660,915 |
16 | Boyd Bien | Lake City, SD 57247 | $641,185 |
17 | Melvin L Oland | Britton, SD 57430 | $640,803 |
18 | Wallace Farms | Elizabeth, AR 72531 | $624,196 |
19 | Deanna Granholm | Brookings, SD 57006 | $618,789 |
20 | Larry Eugene Hanson | Claremont, SD 57432 | $606,021 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>