Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Meade County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 534
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Meade County, South Dakota totaled $3,021,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lyle Wilcox | Red Owl, SD 57787 | $19,318 |
22 | Arcadia LLC | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $19,195 |
23 | Shaw Ranch Inc | White Owl, SD 57792 | $18,879 |
24 | Grady Matt | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $18,781 |
25 | Samuel G Johnston | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $18,181 |
26 | Patrick X Trask | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $17,827 |
27 | Bradley Bauer | Union Center, SD 57787 | $17,690 |
28 | Bradley P Austin | White Owl, SD 57792 | $17,593 |
29 | Shuck Brothers Inc | Union Center, SD 57787 | $17,359 |
30 | Justin G Long | Red Owl, SD 57787 | $17,205 |
31 | Mickey Simons | White Owl, SD 57792 | $17,076 |
32 | Drinda Mcatee-simons | White Owl, SD 57792 | $17,076 |
33 | Duprel Ranch | Vale, SD 57788 | $17,060 |
34 | Carl Peterson Jr | Opal, SD 57758 | $15,999 |
35 | Pleasant Valley Cattle Company Inc | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $15,745 |
36 | John Simons | Enning, SD 57737 | $15,484 |
37 | Bryce J Sigman | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $15,383 |
38 | Deering W Lazy F Ranch LLC | Hereford, SD 57785 | $15,342 |
39 | Kirk Schuelke | Opal, SD 57758 | $15,311 |
40 | Matthew L Kammerer | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $15,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”