Wool and Mohair Programs in Meade County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 158
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Meade County, South Dakota totaled $484,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dale Heaton | White Owl, SD 57792 | $3,772 |
42 | Douglas Smith | Faith, SD 57626 | $3,699 |
43 | Jensen Bros | Union Center, SD 57787 | $3,351 |
44 | Dorothy Kirksey | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $3,146 |
45 | Richard Afdahl | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $3,118 |
46 | Myron J Weiss | Union Center, SD 57787 | $3,057 |
47 | Lonny Collins | Faith, SD 57626 | $2,920 |
48 | Rosalie J Outka | Enning, SD 57737 | $2,718 |
49 | Carlotta Mcgillivray | Mud Butte, SD 57758 | $2,686 |
50 | Norman Mcgillivray | Mud Butte, SD 57758 | $2,686 |
51 | Alton Thompson | Marcus, SD 57785 | $2,653 |
52 | Gerald Wetz | Vale, SD 57788 | $2,649 |
53 | Tracy Keffeler | Gillette, WY 82718 | $2,627 |
54 | Rose M Bucholz | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $2,557 |
55 | Walter Wenzel | Enning, SD 57737 | $2,527 |
56 | Dennis Beckham | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $2,423 |
57 | Francis J Boudreau | Red Owl, SD 57777 | $2,392 |
58 | Jack Overland | Red Owl, SD 57787 | $2,364 |
59 | Theodore Mahaffy | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $2,332 |
60 | Helen Wenzel | Enning, SD 57737 | $2,026 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”