Deficiency Payment in Meade County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 365
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Meade County, South Dakota totaled $329,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dale L Johnson | Vale, SD 57788 | $1,691 |
62 | Perry Ketelsen Estate | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $1,683 |
63 | Mulloy Livestock | Union Center, SD 57787 | $1,642 |
64 | Duane Keffeler | Union Center, SD 57787 | $1,635 |
65 | Charles Larsen | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $1,593 |
66 | Andrew A Duprel | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $1,564 |
67 | Wallace Strong | Union Center, SD 57787 | $1,558 |
68 | Jensen Bros | Union Center, SD 57787 | $1,550 |
69 | Monte Reichert | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $1,536 |
70 | Gerald Wetz | Vale, SD 57788 | $1,498 |
71 | Patrick X Trask | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $1,386 |
72 | John Simons | Enning, SD 57737 | $1,350 |
73 | Carl H Peterson | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $1,317 |
74 | Bert C Corwin | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $1,287 |
75 | Kenneth Casteel | Vale, SD 57788 | $1,282 |
76 | James Francis Silbernagel | Box Elder, SD 57719 | $1,271 |
77 | Donald G Hackens | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $1,222 |
78 | Rod Barry | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $1,219 |
79 | Jack Gravatt | Elm Springs, SD 57736 | $1,214 |
80 | Kenneth Lee & Sons Inc | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $1,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”