Farm Subsidy information
Meade County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Meade County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 717
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Meade County, South Dakota totaled $38,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Allen L Hodgman | Union Center, SD 57787 | $85,802 |
122 | M Andrew Elshere | Faith, SD 57626 | $84,162 |
123 | Danny Arneson | Red Owl, SD 57787 | $84,128 |
124 | Monte Reichert | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $83,641 |
125 | Gregory K Smith | Faith, SD 57626 | $83,509 |
126 | James P Collins | Faith, SD 57626 | $83,201 |
127 | Timothy J Komes | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $82,847 |
128 | Arlie Radway | Howes, SD 57748 | $82,295 |
129 | Clinton R Price | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $81,863 |
130 | Taylor Allen Miller | Faith, SD 57626 | $81,805 |
131 | Larry W Eisenbraun | Wall, SD 57790 | $81,435 |
132 | Travis E Madsen | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $81,226 |
133 | Nena D Madsen | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $81,226 |
134 | Jon P Jordan | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $81,113 |
135 | Wilson Brothers | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $80,794 |
136 | Bryan D Ulring | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $80,675 |
137 | Walter Fees | Opal, SD 57758 | $79,926 |
138 | Burney De King | Howes, SD 57748 | $79,656 |
139 | , | $79,505 | |
140 | Monte S Smith | Faith, SD 57626 | $79,038 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”