Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Mellette County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 265
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Mellette County, South Dakota totaled $3,671,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Millard Brothers | Wood, SD 57585 | $38,089 |
22 | William E Adrian | White River, SD 57579 | $37,826 |
23 | Christopher John Letellier | Norris, SD 57560 | $37,809 |
24 | John Kocer | Winner, SD 57580 | $37,786 |
25 | Duane Earll | Wood, SD 57585 | $35,415 |
26 | Emmylu G Hill | White River, SD 57579 | $34,406 |
27 | Steve Krogman | White River, SD 57579 | $34,321 |
28 | Kathleen Strain | White River, SD 57579 | $34,175 |
29 | Adrian Land & Cattle Company | White River, SD 57579 | $32,150 |
30 | Lance A Tucker | White River, SD 57579 | $31,684 |
31 | Wesley Schmidt | Norris, SD 57560 | $31,498 |
32 | Burton Dimond | Witten, SD 57584 | $31,338 |
33 | Charles J Willard | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $31,003 |
34 | Moran Ranch Inc | Mission, SD 57555 | $30,953 |
35 | Leslie Sherwood | White River, SD 57579 | $30,854 |
36 | Clifton Bryan | White River, SD 57579 | $29,800 |
37 | Dominic M Harmon | Wood, SD 57585 | $28,565 |
38 | John Herber | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $28,100 |
39 | James Herber | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $28,042 |
40 | Steven E Peterson | Salem, SD 57058 | $27,633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”