Farm Subsidy information
Mellette County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Mellette County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 294
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mellette County, South Dakota totaled $9,111,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Charles J Willard | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $47,792 |
42 | Robert H Carr II | Valentine, NE 69201 | $46,891 |
43 | Oleta Valerie Mednansky | White River, SD 57579 | $46,608 |
44 | Dustin D Schmidt | White River, SD 57579 | $43,612 |
45 | Duane Earll | Wood, SD 57585 | $42,208 |
46 | Richard Kingsbury | Wood, SD 57585 | $41,428 |
47 | Lealand Luther Schoon | White River, SD 57579 | $41,423 |
48 | Allen Badure | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $37,698 |
49 | Terry Dean Denny | Winner, SD 57580 | $37,007 |
50 | Emmylu G Hill | White River, SD 57579 | $35,698 |
51 | Jerod B Schwarting | White River, SD 57579 | $35,088 |
52 | Harvey Bierema | White River, SD 57579 | $34,691 |
53 | Drew E Peterson | Salem, SD 57058 | $34,439 |
54 | Moran Ranch Inc | Mission, SD 57555 | $34,252 |
55 | Colby Lacompte | Winner, SD 57580 | $34,235 |
56 | 3 - Q Cattle Company | White River, SD 57579 | $32,727 |
57 | Aureline Green | White River, SD 57579 | $32,727 |
58 | Kathleen Strain | White River, SD 57579 | $31,770 |
59 | John Herber | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $31,172 |
60 | James Herber | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $31,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”