Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Mellette County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 265
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Mellette County, South Dakota totaled $3,671,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Clifford W Olson | White River, SD 57579 | $26,630 |
42 | Aureline Green | White River, SD 57579 | $25,567 |
43 | George Fairbanks | White River, SD 57579 | $24,901 |
44 | Brett Allen Galbraith | Wood, SD 57585 | $24,529 |
45 | Cliff Valburg | White River, SD 57579 | $24,163 |
46 | Donald Bret Strain | White River, SD 57579 | $23,888 |
47 | Oleta Valerie Mednansky | White River, SD 57579 | $23,701 |
48 | Joseph Gesinger | White River, SD 57579 | $23,561 |
49 | Ronald L Bouman | White River, SD 57579 | $23,440 |
50 | Robert H Carr II | Valentine, NE 69201 | $22,960 |
51 | Jerry A Hicks | Norris, SD 57560 | $22,684 |
52 | Leroy Greaves | Okreek, SD 57563 | $22,657 |
53 | Daniel L Krogman | White River, SD 57579 | $22,541 |
54 | Janet Louise Toman | Winner, SD 57580 | $22,408 |
55 | Roger E Glynn | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $22,179 |
56 | 3 - Q Cattle Company | White River, SD 57579 | $21,787 |
57 | William R Bachelor | White River, SD 57579 | $21,553 |
58 | Colby Lacompte | Winner, SD 57580 | $21,521 |
59 | Neil Krogman | White River, SD 57579 | $20,988 |
60 | Bradley Tuttle | Winner, SD 57580 | $20,831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”