Loan Deficiency in Mellette County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 173
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Mellette County, South Dakota totaled $1,982,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mariette Rames | Menno, SD 57045 | $2,789 |
102 | Lewis Fuerst | Blaine, MN 55449 | $2,655 |
103 | Bradley Tuttle | Winner, SD 57580 | $2,626 |
104 | Neil Farnsworth | Carter, SD 57580 | $2,342 |
105 | Aurelia Dickson | Wood, SD 57585 | $2,084 |
106 | Briget A Massingale | Valentine, NE 69201 | $2,066 |
107 | Marjorie N Rice Revocable Trust | Creighton, NE 68729 | $1,739 |
108 | Majel Horstman Estat | Winner, SD 57580 | $1,702 |
109 | Wayne Shouldis | White River, SD 57579 | $1,674 |
110 | Mellette Co Indian Cattle Grazing & Business Inc | White River, SD 57579 | $1,646 |
111 | Melvin Schmidt Jr | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $1,617 |
112 | Waack Family Irrevocable Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $1,584 |
113 | Hank A Walters | Las Vegas, NV 89115 | $1,508 |
114 | Jensen Cattle Corporation | White River, SD 57579 | $1,500 |
115 | Travis Lee Kuil | Carter, SD 57580 | $1,470 |
116 | Sydney Iwan | Midland, SD 57552 | $1,411 |
117 | Siegmund Family Limited Partnersh | Carter, SD 57580 | $1,383 |
118 | Daniel Schmidt | Norris, SD 57560 | $1,371 |
119 | John L Knispel | White River, SD 57579 | $1,330 |
120 | Jeffrey J Gregg | Winner, SD 57580 | $1,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”