Farm Subsidy information
Mellette County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Mellette County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 870
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mellette County, South Dakota totaled $105,136,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | William James Huber | Parmelee, SD 57566 | $2,121,382 |
2 | Kenda Kaye Huber | Parmelee, SD 57566 | $1,676,102 |
3 | Rodney L Vollmer | Black Hawk, SD 57718 | $1,233,563 |
4 | Rueben Ring | Norris, SD 57560 | $1,029,664 |
5 | Rasmussen-lehman 33 Ranch LLC | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $976,755 |
6 | Jake Ring & Sons Inc | Norris, SD 57560 | $971,786 |
7 | Jonathan Kenneth Huber | Parmelee, SD 57566 | $941,132 |
8 | Koskans | Wood, SD 57585 | $931,888 |
9 | David William Huber | Parmelee, SD 57566 | $930,697 |
10 | Jerry Schwarting | White River, SD 57579 | $929,258 |
11 | Ringneck Ranch Llp | Witten, SD 57584 | $834,825 |
12 | Ben Krogman | White River, SD 57579 | $811,505 |
13 | Leslie W Horsley | White River, SD 57579 | $799,311 |
14 | Millard Brothers | Wood, SD 57585 | $798,500 |
15 | Robert E Derry | Wood, SD 57585 | $713,011 |
16 | Eric J Iversen | White River, SD 57579 | $706,840 |
17 | Wade Tucker | Wood, SD 57585 | $685,458 |
18 | Robert Fortune | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $664,293 |
19 | James Bennett | Gregory, SD 57533 | $643,054 |
20 | Robert W Fronek | Winner, SD 57580 | $621,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>