Market Loss Assistance Program in Mellette County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 242
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Mellette County, South Dakota totaled $2,895,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Charles Strait | White River, SD 57579 | $22,959 |
42 | John L Knispel | White River, SD 57579 | $22,784 |
43 | Jerry A Hicks | Norris, SD 57560 | $22,577 |
44 | Verlyn Kuil | Winner, SD 57580 | $22,181 |
45 | Kenneth R Derry | Eliasville, TX 76481 | $21,846 |
46 | Lee Galbraith | Wood, SD 57585 | $20,899 |
47 | Jensen Cattle Corporation | White River, SD 57579 | $20,025 |
48 | Willie Bachmann | Winner, SD 57580 | $19,192 |
49 | Evan L Bligh | Norris, SD 57560 | $19,060 |
50 | Robert W Till | Pierre, SD 57501 | $18,111 |
51 | Mildred L Harrison | White River, SD 57579 | $17,333 |
52 | Robert M Bennett | Wood, SD 57585 | $17,266 |
53 | Bud De Manke | Midland, SD 57552 | $15,998 |
54 | Howard Sherwood | White River, SD 57579 | $15,354 |
55 | R & C Partnership | White River, SD 57579 | $15,015 |
56 | Wade Tucker | Wood, SD 57585 | $15,012 |
57 | Bert S Ryno | White River, SD 57579 | $14,793 |
58 | Mellette Co Indian Cattle Grazing & Business Inc | White River, SD 57579 | $14,783 |
59 | Melvin Schmidt Jr | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $14,535 |
60 | James L Newbold | White River, SD 57579 | $14,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”