Counter Cyclical Program in Miner County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 487
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Miner County, South Dakota totaled $3,586,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas G Wettlaufer | Winfred, SD 57076 | $23,382 |
42 | Bruner Limousin Inc | Winfred, SD 57076 | $23,255 |
43 | Ash Grove Farms Inc | Winfred, SD 57076 | $22,949 |
44 | Rentschler Farms | Howard, SD 57349 | $22,539 |
45 | Bernard Donahue | Fedora, SD 57337 | $22,477 |
46 | Kevin R Schwader | Howard, SD 57349 | $22,065 |
47 | Dennis Feldhaus Sr | Howard, SD 57349 | $21,713 |
48 | Richard W Wettlaufer | Winfred, SD 57076 | $20,996 |
49 | James Lee Brutty | Canova, SD 57321 | $20,673 |
50 | Matthew J Connor | Winfred, SD 57076 | $20,454 |
51 | Dale Edward Shumaker | Howard, SD 57349 | $20,398 |
52 | Terry Lee Stangohr | Howard, SD 57349 | $20,097 |
53 | Shannon Hutterian Brethren | Winfred, SD 57076 | $19,894 |
54 | Martin F Connor | Madison, SD 57042 | $19,411 |
55 | Thomas Gassman | Canova, SD 57321 | $19,264 |
56 | Kelly Endorf | Canova, SD 57321 | $19,173 |
57 | Dale Darwin Hoyer | Howard, SD 57349 | $18,978 |
58 | Richard Philip Calmus | Howard, SD 57349 | $18,869 |
59 | William Todd Walter | Howard, SD 57349 | $18,721 |
60 | Dennis Dean Gassman | Canova, SD 57321 | $18,636 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”