Direct Payment Program in Miner County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 702
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Miner County, South Dakota totaled $18,432,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lan Mark Farms Inc | Howard, SD 57349 | $113,923 |
42 | Terry Lee Stangohr | Howard, SD 57349 | $113,790 |
43 | Randall Ag Ventures | Canistota, SD 57012 | $112,300 |
44 | Kevin R Schwader | Howard, SD 57349 | $112,257 |
45 | Dean Francis Esser | Canova, SD 57321 | $110,690 |
46 | Rentschler Farms | Howard, SD 57349 | $107,016 |
47 | Kim Lewis | Winfred, SD 57076 | $105,700 |
48 | Matthew J Connor | Winfred, SD 57076 | $103,997 |
49 | Roger Glen Moe | Carthage, SD 57323 | $102,537 |
50 | Michael J Connor | Winfred, SD 57076 | $101,568 |
51 | Jamie Al Von Eye | Colman, SD 57017 | $97,907 |
52 | Daniel Von Eye Jr | Colman, SD 57017 | $97,462 |
53 | Gary Stangohr | Howard, SD 57349 | $96,699 |
54 | Bernard Donahue | Fedora, SD 57337 | $95,820 |
55 | Michael David Schulz | Howard, SD 57349 | $95,709 |
56 | Rollin Daryl Schulz | Canova, SD 57321 | $95,698 |
57 | Dale Edward Shumaker | Howard, SD 57349 | $86,550 |
58 | Dennis Dean Gassman | Canova, SD 57321 | $86,005 |
59 | Michael Joseph Gassman | Canova, SD 57321 | $85,791 |
60 | David Skoglund | Salem, SD 57058 | $85,492 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”