Market Gains in Minnehaha County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 413
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Minnehaha County, South Dakota totaled $10,272,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James E Klein | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $55,698 |
62 | Joshua Bernard Burggraff | Colton, SD 57018 | $54,811 |
63 | Bruce E Stockwell | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $53,565 |
64 | Roger Allan Haak | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $53,328 |
65 | Lueth Bros | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $52,577 |
66 | Daniel James Nelson | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $50,414 |
67 | Ricky Lynn Starnes | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $50,399 |
68 | Neal Busser | Colton, SD 57018 | $50,388 |
69 | Kevin Richard Olson | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $50,146 |
70 | John Ryan Sjaarda | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $47,165 |
71 | Vernon L Wirtjes | Brandon, SD 57005 | $47,056 |
72 | Philip J Becker | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $46,752 |
73 | Wayne A Busser | Colton, SD 57018 | $46,316 |
74 | Michael John Siemonsma | Garretson, SD 57030 | $46,203 |
75 | Dubbelde Family Living Trust | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $45,998 |
76 | Michael John Wolles | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $45,850 |
77 | Vincent Leo Huwe | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $45,748 |
78 | M Todd Sundal | Baltic, SD 57003 | $45,681 |
79 | Verne Eugene Endahl | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $45,425 |
80 | John Geurt Maassen | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $45,393 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”