Market Gains in Minnehaha County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 413
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Minnehaha County, South Dakota totaled $10,272,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Todd Dawley | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $238,838 |
2 | Jerome Peter Geraets | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $236,277 |
3 | Jay W Geraets | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $218,200 |
4 | C Jones Family Farm Inc | Hartford, SD 57033 | $165,444 |
5 | James Dean Wehde | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $164,663 |
6 | Raymond & David Funke | Brandon, SD 57005 | $138,526 |
7 | Thomas D Elverson | Sherman, SD 57030 | $127,679 |
8 | Linda Louise Dawley | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $127,578 |
9 | Dale V Benson | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $119,427 |
10 | John Eugene Sjaarda | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $117,946 |
11 | Lauren Stanley Anderson | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $116,250 |
12 | Todd M Brown | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $115,261 |
13 | Michael James Brown | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $110,571 |
14 | Burns Brothers Partnership | Baltic, SD 57003 | $107,977 |
15 | David Arthur Rave | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $107,218 |
16 | Randy R Pierret | Sherman, SD 57030 | $104,322 |
17 | Danny F Randall | Baltic, SD 57003 | $102,582 |
18 | Wright Brothers Partnership | Brandon, SD 57005 | $101,721 |
19 | Richard & Nancy Van Heerde Living Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $100,128 |
20 | Raymond Darrell Jensen | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $97,360 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>