Conservation Reserve Program in Pennington County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 206
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pennington County, South Dakota totaled $8,365,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dennis E Boomsma | Box Elder, SD 57719 | $17,244 |
102 | Roger Barber | Owanka, SD 57767 | $17,119 |
103 | Naescher Family Limited Partnership | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $17,076 |
104 | Joanna S Michels | Wall, SD 57790 | $17,025 |
105 | Lavern Koch | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $16,547 |
106 | Anthony E Crawford | Rapid City, SD 57709 | $16,445 |
107 | Larry L Gossard | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $16,131 |
108 | Sd Ranch 2044 LLC | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $14,397 |
109 | James Haddock | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $14,190 |
110 | Gerad V Julson | Quinn, SD 57775 | $14,137 |
111 | , | $14,137 | |
112 | Emil A Votroubek | Quinn, SD 57775 | $13,846 |
113 | Craig J Bielmaier | Wall, SD 57790 | $13,837 |
114 | Robert M Nash | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $13,745 |
115 | Gregory Shearer | Wall, SD 57790 | $13,607 |
116 | Dale Sawvell | Quinn, SD 57775 | $12,766 |
117 | Kjerstad Farm Partnership | Quinn, SD 57775 | $12,757 |
118 | Trevor Hupp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $12,282 |
119 | Charles Boydston | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $11,608 |
120 | Dean Joseph Klapperich | Wasta, SD 57791 | $11,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”