Emergency Conservation Program in Potter County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 142
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Potter County, South Dakota totaled $866,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beringer Farms Ptn | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $11,452 |
22 | Bruce Mccloud Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $10,974 |
23 | Karl Herman Johannsen | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $10,096 |
24 | Zeigler Farms, Inc. | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $9,568 |
25 | Worth Brothers 4-d Ranch | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $9,548 |
26 | Wayne Simon & Jerad Simon Ptrs | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $9,487 |
27 | Calvin Charles Kula | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $9,099 |
28 | William Arthur Marks | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $8,924 |
29 | Alvin Heier Family Trust | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $8,146 |
30 | Allen Paul Hageman | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $8,092 |
31 | M & R Rausch Farm Ptn | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $7,900 |
32 | Daniel Thomas | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $7,451 |
33 | Clifford John Keller | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $7,425 |
34 | Raymond Kenneth Beckler | Seneca, SD 57473 | $7,413 |
35 | Vogel & Sautner & Sons Ptn Delete | Hoven, SD 57450 | $7,172 |
36 | Donna Nylander | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $6,672 |
37 | Eriksen Ranch | Lebanon, SD 57455 | $6,650 |
38 | Roger Simon Family Farms Inc | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $6,489 |
39 | Richard Allan Kaup | Hoven, SD 57450 | $6,443 |
40 | Dale E Bryant | Seneca, SD 57473 | $5,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”