Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Potter County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 117
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Potter County, South Dakota totaled $322,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Levi Vander Vorst | Akaska, SD 57420 | $2,336 |
42 | Ray Beckler Farm, LLC | Seneca, SD 57473 | $2,316 |
43 | Michael S Derouchey Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $2,287 |
44 | Dale G Nauman Estate | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $2,247 |
45 | Stanley Richard Hunnel | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $2,245 |
46 | Donald Joseph Karst | Hoven, SD 57450 | $2,242 |
47 | Kirby Land & Cattle | Lebanon, SD 57455 | $2,169 |
48 | Joe C Senn | Seneca, SD 57473 | $2,160 |
49 | Wayne Simon & Jerad Simon Ptrs | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $2,094 |
50 | Lanny D Wager | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $2,050 |
51 | Delbert L Fast | Onida, SD 57564 | $1,977 |
52 | James W Edinger | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $1,967 |
53 | Anthony Rausch | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $1,910 |
54 | Dustin D Wager | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $1,880 |
55 | Abler Farms Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $1,859 |
56 | Jesse Lee Hartung | Hoven, SD 57450 | $1,640 |
57 | Mann Limited Partnership | Luverne, MN 56156 | $1,579 |
58 | Steven Muller | Agar, SD 57520 | $1,501 |
59 | Karl Herman Johannsen | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $1,430 |
60 | Keith Arnold Eidam | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $1,421 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”