Farm Subsidy information
Potter County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Potter County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 310
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Potter County, South Dakota totaled $20,200,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Richard Allan Kaup | Hoven, SD 57450 | $15,594 |
82 | Karl Herman Johannsen | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $15,589 |
83 | Keith Alan Kaup | Hoven, SD 57450 | $15,365 |
84 | Devyn William Lemler | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $15,332 |
85 | Brooks J Hoven | Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 | $15,330 |
86 | Mark E Hoven | Littleton, CO 80124 | $15,330 |
87 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $14,852 |
88 | Nick Rausch Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $14,576 |
89 | Dakota Land Visions Llp | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $14,528 |
90 | Neil W Rausch | Hoven, SD 57450 | $14,383 |
91 | Houck Livestock Inc | Akaska, SD 57420 | $13,898 |
92 | , | $13,777 | |
93 | Cody Lyle Holzwarth | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $13,565 |
94 | Corliss Ann Kellogg | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $13,531 |
95 | , | $13,473 | |
96 | Troy Abler | Hoven, SD 57450 | $12,674 |
97 | James H. Hepper Credit Shelter Trust | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $12,564 |
98 | Edith J.hepper Surviving Granter's Revocable Trust | Redfield, SD 57469 | $12,563 |
99 | Karen Sue Doerr | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $12,540 |
100 | James R Brown | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $12,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”