Total Conservation Programs in Potter County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 553
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Potter County, South Dakota totaled $33,021,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rita Mae Turner | Hoven, SD 57450 | $110,068 |
82 | Martha Banik | Hartford, SD 57033 | $108,763 |
83 | Dale E Bryant | Seneca, SD 57473 | $108,412 |
84 | Hottman Ptnshp%corinne Martin | Commerce City, CO 80022 | $107,235 |
85 | B W Simon Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $103,808 |
86 | Robert B Heath | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $103,751 |
87 | M E Simon Farms Inc | Lebanon, SD 57455 | $101,925 |
88 | James Francis Doerr | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $101,417 |
89 | Robert Dean Houck | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $101,270 |
90 | Dakota Land Visions Llp | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $100,810 |
91 | Murphy Family Trust | Gilbert, AZ 85297 | $100,000 |
92 | Wayne Oliver Vandervorst | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $98,901 |
93 | Lanny D Wager | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $98,167 |
94 | R L Simon Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $97,996 |
95 | Inez M Kula Family Trust | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $96,809 |
96 | Joann Starks-gunn | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $96,588 |
97 | Ellenbecker Family Land Limited Partnership | Olathe, KS 66061 | $96,572 |
98 | Robert Carey And Althea Carey Rev Trust Agreement | Olathe, KS 66061 | $96,165 |
99 | Ljr Family Partnership | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $95,949 |
100 | Ronald Finn Dahlquist | Lebanon, SD 57455 | $95,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”