Farm Subsidy information
Potter County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Potter County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 405
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Potter County, South Dakota totaled $23,774,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Dane B. Lemler | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $24,999 |
142 | Ladonna Rose Schneider | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $24,423 |
143 | William Fischer | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $24,120 |
144 | Sylte Bros | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $24,025 |
145 | Djl Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $23,995 |
146 | William Keller | Watertown, SD 57201 | $23,575 |
147 | Casey Jon Oster | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $22,756 |
148 | Thad Edward Beringer | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $22,648 |
149 | Kaiser Brothers Farms Inc | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $22,500 |
150 | Nathanael Ayres Williams | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $22,475 |
151 | Daniel Thomas | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $22,407 |
152 | Brian Simon | Seneca, SD 57473 | $22,258 |
153 | V T Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $21,847 |
154 | Jesse Frost | Hoven, SD 57450 | $21,823 |
155 | Charles Hamburger | Seneca, SD 57473 | $21,792 |
156 | Stanley Richard Hunnel | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $21,702 |
157 | Lake Land And Cattle Co | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $21,556 |
158 | James W Edinger | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $21,232 |
159 | James Francis Simon | Lebanon, SD 57455 | $21,148 |
160 | Virginia Hawkinson | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $21,058 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”