Farm Subsidy information
Potter County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Potter County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 405
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Potter County, South Dakota totaled $23,774,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Casey J Thomas | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $20,604 |
162 | Eric T Johannsen | Bath, SD 57427 | $20,335 |
163 | Royce A Ritter | Akaska, SD 57420 | $19,784 |
164 | David Nauman | Pierre, SD 57501 | $19,604 |
165 | William Joseph Frost | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $19,536 |
166 | Roger Moore | Brookings, SD 57006 | $19,536 |
167 | Michael W Baus | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $19,504 |
168 | Gerald W Frost Estate | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $19,158 |
169 | Pbk Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $19,155 |
170 | Terry R Benson | Apo, 96553 | $18,741 |
171 | Leroy Benson | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $18,654 |
172 | Lauren J Oster | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $18,565 |
173 | Tkl Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $18,205 |
174 | Double B Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $17,876 |
175 | Robert Glenn Westphal | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $17,555 |
176 | S & P Sheldon Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $17,171 |
177 | Margery Ann Houck | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $17,036 |
178 | Randy Hegstrom | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $16,917 |
179 | Carson John Kirby | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $16,840 |
180 | Corinne Martin | Commerce City, CO 80022 | $16,769 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”