Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Roberts County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 122
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $626,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sarah Jean Goodhart | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $4,785 |
42 | Christopherson Farms Inc | New Effington, SD 57255 | $4,533 |
43 | Austin James Bostrom | New Effington, SD 57255 | $4,452 |
44 | Elizabeth Marie Mc Daniel | New Effington, SD 57255 | $4,355 |
45 | Harstad Farms Inc | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $4,248 |
46 | August John Wieser Jr | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $3,762 |
47 | , | $3,646 | |
48 | L & J Nigg Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $3,450 |
49 | , | $3,446 | |
50 | Branden Dale Oletzke | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $3,443 |
51 | Derek N Peterson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $3,421 |
52 | Dylan James Haanen | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $3,361 |
53 | Dean Myles Peterson | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $3,217 |
54 | Daren James Koeppe | Claire City, SD 57224 | $3,106 |
55 | Aaron M Pistorius | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $3,077 |
56 | Zachary Joseph Crown | Corona, SD 57227 | $2,954 |
57 | , | $2,837 | |
58 | Ethan Kevin Medenwald | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $2,798 |
59 | Whipple Ranch Inc | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $2,676 |
60 | Holly Aileen Monson Butrum | Veblen, SD 57270 | $2,632 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”