Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 188
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $1,412,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Leon Koeppe | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $4,813 |
42 | Lawrence Pelzel | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $4,759 |
43 | Arthur L Ceroll | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $4,694 |
44 | Steven R Minder | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $4,678 |
45 | Jerome Serocki | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $4,243 |
46 | Travis R Ceroll | Roslyn, SD 57261 | $4,241 |
47 | Clayton Elroy Palmquist | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $4,200 |
48 | Kenneth Herding | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $4,027 |
49 | Ricky Lee Ammann | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $4,027 |
50 | Roy M Greiner | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $3,966 |
51 | Jesse J Cameron | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $3,902 |
52 | Todd Eugene Sprung | Corona, SD 57227 | $3,615 |
53 | Ronald-ronald Ceroll Ceroll | New Effington, SD 57255 | $3,608 |
54 | Daniel Foltz | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $3,582 |
55 | Keith Douglas Mendenhall | Waubay, SD 57273 | $3,519 |
56 | Nicarnia A Loberg | New Effington, SD 57255 | $3,495 |
57 | Calvin James Thompson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $3,438 |
58 | Duane W Steege | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $3,396 |
59 | Paul Bostrom | New Effington, SD 57255 | $3,386 |
60 | Mark Wayne Peterson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $3,196 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”