Counter Cyclical Program in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 981
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $5,735,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Elroy-elroy G Klein Klein | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $27,477 |
42 | Russel W Howard | Milbank, SD 57252 | $27,326 |
43 | Erin Braun | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $26,887 |
44 | Donald Nicholas Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $26,757 |
45 | Daniel Alexander Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $26,752 |
46 | Ronald John Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $26,749 |
47 | Neil Alan Bartnick | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $26,723 |
48 | Linn Vig Farms Inc | Claire City, SD 57224 | $26,547 |
49 | Andrew Gordon Schiltz | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $26,526 |
50 | Daniel Leroy Meyer | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $26,290 |
51 | Whempner Brothers | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $26,268 |
52 | George A Pohl | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $25,998 |
53 | Ronald Thomas Nissen | New Effington, SD 57255 | $25,896 |
54 | L & J Nigg Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $25,842 |
55 | Walter J & Avis E Brandenburger R | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $25,141 |
56 | Nieland Farms Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $24,597 |
57 | David Lloyd Pierce | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $24,527 |
58 | Richard Dean Heesch | New Effington, SD 57255 | $23,981 |
59 | Leslie Schiltz | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $23,910 |
60 | Dewain Joseph Waletich Jr | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $23,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”