Emergency Conservation Program in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 155
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $756,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Nicholas E Wasilk | Waubay, SD 57273 | $3,100 |
62 | Ronald John Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $2,981 |
63 | Eric Dahl | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $2,865 |
64 | Byron Dean Deboer | Corona, SD 57227 | $2,815 |
65 | Lee Whempner | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $2,642 |
66 | Keith Rayburn Butrum | Veblen, SD 57270 | $2,571 |
67 | George H Tepley | Monroe, WA 98272 | $2,496 |
68 | Clayton Elroy Palmquist | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $2,470 |
69 | Steve Kane | South Shore, SD 57263 | $2,393 |
70 | Lynn Nigg | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $2,367 |
71 | Leon Koeppe | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $2,334 |
72 | Richard Boerma | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,325 |
73 | Gordon Berwald | Summit, SD 57266 | $2,280 |
74 | Jordan Tekrony | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $2,268 |
75 | Steven R Minder | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $2,232 |
76 | Duane W Steege | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $2,221 |
77 | Sanford Vig | Claire City, SD 57224 | $2,069 |
78 | Mark A Hove | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $2,025 |
79 | Robbie Alan Bucklin | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $1,984 |
80 | Joshua Florey | Watertown, SD 57201 | $1,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”