Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Roberts County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 122
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $626,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Austin Rolstad | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $2,563 |
62 | Goodhart Farms Inc | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $2,451 |
63 | , | $2,290 | |
64 | Gaukler Farms Inc | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $2,237 |
65 | Trevor John Peterson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $2,199 |
66 | Jacob Prins | Eden, SD 57232 | $2,131 |
67 | Tanner Kutter | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $2,050 |
68 | Michael David Argo | Peever, SD 57257 | $1,884 |
69 | June Mary Helgeson | Peever, SD 57257 | $1,786 |
70 | Lance Elling Nelson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $1,726 |
71 | Eli Thomas Nissen | New Effington, SD 57255 | $1,650 |
72 | Lowell O Lundstrom Jr | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $1,600 |
73 | Tasha Marie Heesch | New Effington, SD 57255 | $1,547 |
74 | Linda Dahl | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $1,543 |
75 | Brandon Gieser | Claire City, SD 57224 | $1,474 |
76 | Weston Thomas Leverson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $1,453 |
77 | Garret Scott Leverson | New Effington, SD 57255 | $1,450 |
78 | Ashley Elizabeth Frerichs | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $1,285 |
79 | Janet Ceroll | New Effington, SD 57255 | $1,265 |
80 | Amy Jo Piotter | New Effington, SD 57255 | $1,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”