Farm Subsidy information
Roberts County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,246
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $581,238,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Art Brandenburger | New Effington, SD 57255 | $879,981 |
62 | James Edward Mc Daniel Estate | New Effington, SD 57255 | $873,430 |
63 | Sherman K Hustel | Veblen, SD 57270 | $870,487 |
64 | Whipple Ranch Inc | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $865,442 |
65 | David Balvin | Claire City, SD 57224 | $853,688 |
66 | Nieland Farms Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $852,615 |
67 | Kenneth Robert Currence Jr | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $849,911 |
68 | William Nigg Living Trust | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $847,371 |
69 | David Mittchell Geurts | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $835,704 |
70 | Foltz Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $833,663 |
71 | Ronald Nicholas Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $830,731 |
72 | Dayle Haaland | Veblen, SD 57270 | $829,700 |
73 | Arthur L Ceroll | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $814,100 |
74 | Merlyn Myles Peterson | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $811,545 |
75 | David Roy Nigg | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $806,451 |
76 | Douglas Langager | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $805,636 |
77 | Chad D Braun | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $804,523 |
78 | Kenneth Mark Hannasch | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $801,515 |
79 | David B Hansen | New Effington, SD 57255 | $800,978 |
80 | Dennis Hamling | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $800,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”