Farm Subsidy information
Roberts County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,246
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $581,238,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ronald Kohl | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $799,245 |
82 | Rodney Westby | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $795,026 |
83 | Mark Vincent Pillatzki | Corona, SD 57227 | $793,821 |
84 | Ronald-ronald Ceroll Ceroll | New Effington, SD 57255 | $791,973 |
85 | John Peter Ebben | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $786,150 |
86 | Richard Ralph Pillatzki | Milbank, SD 57252 | $784,664 |
87 | Paul Allen Serocki | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $784,636 |
88 | Julie Braun | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $784,490 |
89 | Brian Vig | Claire City, SD 57224 | $781,972 |
90 | Mark George Roark | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $776,526 |
91 | Richard Renelt | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $774,156 |
92 | Neil Fritz | New Effington, SD 57255 | $773,908 |
93 | Donald Kriz | Claire City, SD 57224 | $772,823 |
94 | Johnson Beef Farms Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $771,094 |
95 | Larry J Lekness | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $745,915 |
96 | Eugene Hrncir | Watertown, SD 57201 | $742,965 |
97 | Thomas Bisek | New Effington, SD 57255 | $738,898 |
98 | Walter J & Avis E Brandenburger R | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $735,607 |
99 | Daniel Michael Nigg | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $729,354 |
100 | Leslie Scott Heinecke | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $728,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”